From: Subject: 34n999c Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:01:35 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/def/0999.htm X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 34n999c
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 999=20
DATE: 2008-03-17
 

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
Document Description and Processing=20 Languages
Secretariat: Japan = (JISC)=20

DOC. TYPE Summary of Voting/Table of Replies
TITLE Summary of Voting on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 962 : ISO/IEC = 9541-3/PDAM=20 2, Information technology -- Font Information Interchange -- Part = 3: Glyph=20 Shape Representation -- Amendment 2: Additional Shape = Representation=20 Technology for Open Font Format
SOURCE SC 34 Secretariat
PROJECT 9541-3/Amd. 2
STATUS Based on the ballot responses, this PDAM is APPROVED. WG 2 is=20 requested to prepare a disposition of comments report and revised = text for=20 further processing.
ACTION ID FYI
DUE DATE  
DISTRIBUTION P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 ; ISO/IEC JTC 1 = Secretariat;=20 ISO/IEC ITTF
ACCESS LEVEL Def
ISSUE NO. 14
FILE
NAME
SIZE (KB)
PAGES
0999.htm
 
3

Secretariat=20 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 - IPSJ/ITSCJ (Information Processing Society of=20 Japan/Information Technology Standards Commission of Japan)* Room 308-3, = Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg., 3-5-8, Shiba-Koen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011 = Japan=20 *Standard Organization Accredited by JISC
Telephone: = +81-3-3431-2808;=20 Facsimile: +81-3-3431-6493; E-mail: kimura @ itscj.ipsj.or.jp


Summary of Voting on
ISO/IEC JTC = 1/SC 34 N=20 962 :
ISO/IEC 9541-3/PDAM 2, Information technology -- Font=20 Information Interchange -- Part 3: Glyph Shape Representation -- = Amendment=20 2: Additional Shape Representation Technology for Open Font Format =
Q1 : PDAM
  Q1 No response Comments
Reasons
Approve Disapprove Abstention
P-Member
Brazil     X    
Bulgaria X        
Canada X        
Chile     X    
China X        
Colombia     X    
Cote-d'Ivoire       X  
Cyprus       X  
Czech Republic X        
Denmark     X    
Egypt       X  
Finland     X    
France       X  
Germany X        
India       X  
Italy X        
Japan X*        
Kazakhstan       X  
Kenya X        
Korea, Republic of X        
Lebanon       X  
Luxembourg     X    
Malaysia     X    
Malta     X    
Netherlands     X    
New Zealand       X  
Norway X        
Pakistan       X  
Poland     X    
Romania       X  
South Africa     X    
Sri Lanka       X  
Sweden     X    
Switzerland     X    
Thailand X        
Trinidad and Tobago       X  
Turkey       X  
United Kingdom     X    
USA X        
Venezuela       X  
Total (40) 12 0 14 14  
*: Approve with comments
#: Acceptance of the = reasons and=20 appropriate changes in the text will change the vote to approval.=20

Japan

Copmments on ISO/IEC 9541-3/PDAM 2

a) Page 1, the introduction should clarify the requirement of ISO/IEC = 9541-3=20 Amd. 2. ISO/IEC 14496-22 does not include the specifications of glyph = shape=20 representations that are used in it, ISO/IEC 9541-3 Amd. 2 provides one = of=20 them.

b) Page 1 and 2, in replacement of 1.7.2, the year 2007 has already = passed,=20 AM2:2007 should be corrected with AM2:2008.

c) Page 1, in replacement of clause 1.7.2, although there is no = canonical=20 syntax to include multiple Amendments, the insertion of "and" between = AM1:2004=20 and AM2:2007 is expected.

d) Page 3, in new clause 4.4, "extended Type 1 glyph representation" = in the=20 title of Table 3 should be collected with "Open Type 3".

e) Page 3, in new clause 4.4, only table 1 and 2 in clause 2.7.3 of = ISO/IEC=20 9541-3 are referred, but all of 2.7.3 should be referred, because it = describes=20 that the bolden characters denotes the operators, and the normal = characters=20 denotes the operands.

f) Page 3, in new clause 4.4, "glyph representation" should be = corrected with=20 "glyph shape representation".

g) Page 3, in new clause 4.4, "should not be used" should be = corrected with=20 "deprecated".

h) Page 10, in new clause 4.6.1.1, "are replaced by" should be = corrected with=20 "should be replaced with".

i) Page 11, in new clause 4.6.1.2, "are replaced by" should be = corrected with=20 "should be replaced with".

j) In all pages, "Bezier" should be corrected with = "B=E9zier".


Malta

Expertise not=20 available in Malta on this subject

Netherlands

No experts = available.

United = Kingdom

The UK=20 does not have expertise in font information interchange and does not = participate=20 in SC 34/WG 2.